Published: December 03, 2018 13:00:02 | Updated: December 05, 2018 15:43:38
A New Zealand woman has unsuccessfully argued that she was a victim of racial discrimination after being labelled a ‘Kiwi’ by her colleagues in Australia.
Julie Savage said she was disrespected when her boss and co-workers referred to her as ‘Kiwi’ instead of her name.
However an Australian tribunal ruled that she had not suffered unfair treatment or discrimination at work.
A judge noted that the term was commonly used by New Zealanders themselves.
“Calling a New Zealander a ‘Kiwi’ is not of itself offensive. ‘Kiwi’ is not an insult,” said Judge Leonie Farrell.
She added that the word was often viewed as a “term of endearment”.
It is derived from the name of a flightless bird native to the country, says a BBC report.
Savage said the issue had prompted her to resign from her job as a supervisor at Vili’s Cakes, a bakery in Adelaide, in 2016.
She later lodged a complaint with the South Australian Employment Tribunal.
But it found no evidence that discrimination laws had been violated.
“[She] did not allege that she suffered unfavourable treatment in respect of the terms of her employment, lack of progression or segregation,” Ms Farrell said.
“At its core [her complaint] is not about racism.”
The bakery’s owner, Vili Milisits, told local media that the “right outcome” had been reached.
WWII ‘kissing sailor’ dies aged 95
Firefighters ‘rescue’ lion from tree
Miscreants vandalise Karl Marx’s monument again
New electric shocks inquiry in Australia
Rare black leopard caught on camera for first time in 100 years
300 cars go missing after global summit
Choosing honesty over Tk 500,000
Indonesia police apologise for using snake in interrogation
© 2017 - All Rights with The Financial Express