Published :
Updated :
For all latest news, follow The Financial Express Google News channel.
The turning of the year rarely arrives quietly. In Bangladesh, as in much of the world, the dawn of 2026 comes weighted with both memory and expectation -- memory of a turbulent transition and expectation of a long-delayed recovery. If 2025 was a year of endurance, 2026 must become a year of delivery.
Bangladesh enters the new year after one of the most consequential political ruptures in its post-independence history. The student-led mass uprising of 2024 dismantled a long-entrenched political order and forced the state to confront its institutional frailties. What followed in 2025 was not a revolution in motion, but something arguably harder: the painstaking work of stabilisation. It was a year spent holding the line -- preventing collapse, calming the streets, restoring basic credibility to public institutions.
That effort, though incomplete, mattered. In a country where political transitions have often been accompanied by violence, vengeance or paralysis, the absence of systemic breakdown itself counts as an achievement. Yet stability, by its nature, is not a destination. It is merely the condition that allows movement. As Bangladesh steps into 2026, the central question is no longer whether the state can survive change, but whether it can convert that survival into renewal.
The reform agenda launched in 2025 offered early signs of intent. Initiatives to restructure the Election Commission, overhaul policing practices and reopen political dialogue signalled a departure from the authoritarian reflexes of the past. Equally significant was the emergence of new political actors -- movements and parties shaped not only by dynastic politics, but by a younger generation's insistence on accountability, dignity and participation.
Still, reform in Bangladesh has long suffered from a familiar flaw: ambition unmoored from execution. Institutions announced to be "reformed" too often remain structurally unchanged, their cultures intact, their loyalties untested. In 2026, reform must move beyond proclamations and committees. Electoral credibility will not be restored by new commissioners alone, but by transparent enforcement of rules, equal access to political space and a demonstrable break from managed outcomes. Police reform will not succeed unless accountability mechanisms replace impunity and public trust replaces fear.
Nowhere, however, is the urgency of delivery more acute than in the economy. For ordinary Bangladeshis, the political drama of recent years has been experienced less through speeches than through prices. High inflation eroded household incomes throughout 2025, while persistent weakness in the banking sector exposed years of mismanagement, crony lending and regulatory capture. The economic pain was not abstract; it was felt daily -- in markets, in rent payments, in the shrinking margins of survival for the lower and middle classes.
That the economy avoided outright crisis owed less to domestic strength than to external lifelines. Remittances reached record levels, providing a vital cushion for foreign exchange reserves. International partners, including the IMF, extended support that helped prevent a balance-of-payments shock. These interventions bought time. They did not, and cannot, substitute for reform.
In 2026, Bangladesh must decide how to use that time. Banking sector reform can no longer be deferred or diluted. Bad loans must be addressed honestly, not concealed through rescheduling or regulatory forbearance. State-owned banks require professional governance insulated from political interference, while private banks must be held to uniform standards. Without restoring confidence in the financial system, investment --both domestic and foreign -- will remain timid.
Inflation control, too, demands coordinated action. Monetary tightening alone will not suffice in an economy where supply-side distortions, import dependence and market syndicates exert outsized influence. Strengthening competition policy, improving logistics and ensuring transparency in commodity markets are as essential as central bank decisions. Economic recovery will be judged not by growth figures, but by whether families can once again plan beyond the next month.
The global context offers both risks and opportunities. A fragmented world economy, marked by geopolitical rivalries and protectionist impulses, limits the space for export-led growth. Yet Bangladesh's strategic position -- geographically, demographically and diplomatically -- also provides leverage. Diversifying trade partnerships, upgrading manufacturing beyond low-value garments and investing in skills could help the country navigate an uncertain global order.
Diplomacy, however, must be anchored in domestic coherence. Bangladesh's foreign policy recalibration since 2024 reflects an understandable desire to rebalance relationships and assert autonomy. But credibility abroad ultimately depends on stability at home. Investors, development partners and regional allies will watch closely in 2026 to see whether political pluralism deepens or fractures, whether reform consolidates or stalls.
The greatest test may lie in managing expectations. The uprising of 2024 raised hopes not just for change, but for rapid transformation. Yet history suggests that post-authoritarian transitions are rarely linear. Disappointment, if unaddressed, can curdle into cynicism. The task of leadership in 2026 is therefore as much narrative as policy-driven: to communicate honestly about constraints, timelines and trade-offs, while demonstrating visible progress where it matters most.
That progress must include social justice. Economic rebound that bypasses the poor or sidelines youth will prove politically fragile. Job creation, particularly for educated young people, is no longer optional. Nor is addressing inequality -- between urban and rural areas, formal and informal workers, men and women. Stability without inclusion is merely postponed instability.
As Bangladesh stands at the threshold of 2026, the mood is neither triumphant nor despairing. It is cautious, watchful, expectant. The past year showed that collapse can be avoided. The year ahead must show that renewal is possible.
The new year is more than a date. It is a demand. For Bangladesh, 2026 must answer a simple but profound question: can a nation that survived upheaval now build a future worthy of its sacrifice?