Congress seeks clarity on Trump’s exit plan as Iran war drags on

US lawmakers are increasingly pressing President Donald Trump for a clear exit strategy as the war with Iran enters its third week, raising concerns over its duration, costs and objectives.

The conflict, launched without formal congressional approval, has already resulted in the deaths of at least 13 US service members, with more than 230 injured. Meanwhile, the Pentagon has requested about $200 billion in additional funding, as oil prices rise, US allies come under attack and thousands of American troops are deployed to the Middle East without a defined endgame.

Republican Sen. Thom Tillis questioned the administration’s long-term goals, saying there needs to be a clearer articulation of strategy despite his general support for targeting Iran’s leadership.

Trump said Friday he is considering “winding down” operations, even as he continues to outline shifting objectives.

Congress divided, but pressure builds
The war is testing Congress, particularly Republicans who largely back the president but may soon face tougher decisions. Under the War Powers Act, the president can carry out military action for up to 60 days without congressional approval.

So far, Republican lawmakers have blocked Democratic efforts to halt the campaign. However, pressure is mounting on the administration to present a coherent strategy, especially as lawmakers weigh approving billions in new funding.

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner criticized Trump’s remark that the war would end “when I feel it in my bones,” calling it alarming and lacking strategic clarity.

Mixed signals on progress
House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested the mission is nearly complete, saying key objectives such as weakening Iran’s missile capabilities and naval strength have largely been achieved.

However, he acknowledged ongoing tensions, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, and limited support from US allies.

Lawmakers from both parties say the administration’s goals — including curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions and missile programs — remain unclear and difficult to achieve without deeper military involvement.

Funding concerns intensify
The Pentagon’s request for $200 billion in additional war funding has drawn sharp criticism. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer described the figure as excessive.

Sen. Mazie Hirono argued that domestic priorities such as healthcare and food assistance should take precedence over increased military spending.

Many lawmakers have also recalled how President George W. Bush sought congressional authorization following the September 11 attacks before launching wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Tillis warned that while Trump currently has authority under the War Powers Act, the administration will soon need to either seek formal authorization or present a clear plan to end the conflict.

“These are really the options the administration needs to be thinking about,” he said.