Coppola's ambitious Megalopolis: A vision for the future or a film before its time?

After 40 years of planning and self-financing, Francis Ford Coppola finally brings Megalopolis to the screen, a passion project that he has dreamt of since the late 1970s. It's not just a film for Coppola, it's the manifestation of his vision, shaped by the parallel between ancient Rome and modern American society.

Coppola's decision to self-fund the entire $120 million project shows his deep commitment to realize this ambitious dream, a feat that few directors in today's industry would dare to take.

With studios passing on the film due to its complex narrative and non-mainstream themes, Coppola was determined to bring his vision to life, even at great personal cost. But now that Megalopolis is finally here, there lies a question: Is it a misunderstood masterpiece or a chaotic disaster?

The theme of Megalopolis is about societal transformation and ambition in New Rome City, focusing on a philosophical battle between progressive architect Cesar Catilina (Adam Driver) and corrupt mayor Franklyn Cicero (Giancarlo Esposito).

Cesar aims to rebuild New Rome into a romantic city using Megalon, a magical building material. At the same time, Cicero represents a power-hungry opposition seeking to maintain the city's decaying structure for personal gain.

Megalopolis is a fascinating exploration of human progress but struggles with its ambition. The plot, filled with philosophical debates, metaphors, and Shakespearean connotations, often becomes convoluted.

Cesar's ability to stop time is barely explained, and his relationship with Cicero's daughter Julia (Nathalie Emmanuel) complicates the story.

The complexity of the film makes it difficult for general audiences to grasp its deeper meanings. The movie tries to juggle multiple themes, including the fall of Rome as a metaphor for America's future and the battle between power and idealism. The futuristic New Rome City feels like a golden-hued version of New York with superficial changes.

Megalopolis also includes some intriguing elements. The conflict between Cesar and Cicero reflects the age-old debate between progress and conservatism, ambition and caution.

Adam Driver plays Cesar, a man possessed by the ambition to transform the world with his trademark zeal. Meanwhile, Esposito delivers the film's most grounded performance as Cicero, playing a villain whose selfish reasons make him the most human character in the movie. Nathalie Emmanuel also succeeds as Julia, bringing emotional depth to an otherwise cerebral drama.

In this film, Coppola's grandiose vision is admirable, but the convoluted narrative and lack of coherence shadow its visual beauty. The film's supporting characters, such as Aubrey Plaza's portrayal of Wow Platinum and Jon Voight's character Crassus, feel like distractions.

Despite these criticisms, the film's visual design, including futuristic cityscapes and lavish costumes, contributes to an otherworldly aesthetic that sometimes compensates for the film's deeper flaws.

Megalopolis, a film that may not be suitable for the present, could find its audience in the future. Similar to Blade Runner, it might be appreciated by future generations as a cult classic.

Despite its potential, it needed to be more ambitious for its good. This film will spark debate for years, and it will likely inspire discussions about art, ambition, and society's future. Despite its potential, Megalopolis may not be loved today.

[email protected]