Ridley Scott depicts Napoleon ambitiously but with some flaws

Ridley Scott, one of the most celebrated Hollywood directors, is famous for his science fiction and historical epic classics. Almost two decades after his most famous epic film, Gladiator, he is back with another epic, even though he is 85. 

Napoleon is based on the life of French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, his illustrious rise to power and downfall.

The tumultuous life of the iconic French leader unfolds in a series of impressive battle sequences, but the film struggles to weave them into a cohesive narrative. 

Joaquin Phoenix's stellar performance captures the complexities of Napoleon Bonaparte, offering a glimpse into the flawed man behind the historical figure. The unique language approach, maintaining natural accents, adds realism to the portrayal.

Scott's craftsmanship is evident in the film's accomplished battle sequences, showcasing his prowess in staging intense and immersive warfare. From the captivating Siege of Toulon to the sweeping Battle of Austerlitz, the movie leaves no stone unturned in portraying the military genius of Bonaparte. 

However, despite these strengths, the film stumbles in its overarching narrative, with pacing and time management issues causing its 2 hours and 40 minutes to feel longer than it should.

The narrative attempts to encapsulate Napoleon's entire life, from his ambitious ascent as a young officer to becoming the iconic French leader. 

The script, written by David Scarpa, struggles with compressing the significant events in Napoleon's life into a single film, resulting in moments that lack the necessary passion and connection. 

The film's emotional depth takes a hit, particularly in portraying Napoleon's relationship with Josephine, played by Vanessa Kirby. While the battle scenes are captivating, the personal dynamics between the characters sometimes fall flat, leaving audiences yearning for more details.

The movie's unique approach to humour stands out, injecting a surprising and humanizing element into historical events. However, the execution of this humour is pivotal, as certain scenes portrayed in the trailer miss the mark but find their comedic rhythm within the broader context of the film. It's a testament to Scott's directorial finesse and the cast's ability to breathe life into historical characters, making them relatable unexpectedly.

Despite its shortcomings, Napoleon remains a visually stunning cinematic journey, with solid performances, grand battle sequences, and attention to historical accuracy. 

The announcement of a four-hour director's cut raises hopes for a smoother narrative flow, potentially addressing the missing moments contributing to the film's pacing issues. The film reflects on the balance between historical accuracy and cinematic spectacle, with Scott's ambition sometimes overshadowing the demands of the narrative.

As audiences struggle with the dichotomy of a film brimming with technical brilliance yet marred by narrative hiccups, Napoleon incites concern about the challenges of translating complex historical figures onto the big screen. Scott's vision, while ambitious, leaves viewers wanting a more cohesive exploration of Napoleon's life and character. 

[email protected]