Can domestic policies alone boost trade?

The question whether domestic policies alone can effectively boost trade has no easy and simple answers. External factors may determine its course. To understand the impact and limitations of such policies, it is essential to consider them within the broader context of today's global trading environment-an environment shaped as much by external forces as by internal ones.

It is commonly acknowledged that the power of domestic policies to stimulate trade has certain limits, particularly when considered against the backdrop of an ever more interconnected and interdependent global economy. Trade today is less about isolated national efforts and more about navigating a web of regional agreements, international regulations, and cross-border market dynamics. While domestic policy frameworks-such as competition policy, export-import (exim) policy, and industrial policy-play a crucial role in shaping the trade potential of a country, their influence is significantly constrained by external variables over which countries, especially developing and less-developed ones, have limited control.

Domestic policies are generally geared towards creating an enabling environment within the national economy. They aim to ensure price stability, encourage fair business practices, enhance industrial productivity, and create infrastructure conducive to trade. These measures support domestic firms in becoming more competitive, both at home and abroad. For example, a well-formulated industrial policy may promote sector-specific growth, leading to increased production for export. Similarly, competition policy can reduce monopolistic tendencies and improve consumer choice and pricing, thereby indirectly influencing the global competitiveness of domestic firms.

However, this is only one side of the coin. The other side presents a more challenging picture. No matter how sound a country's internal policies are, they often fall short of addressing trade barriers imposed by foreign partners. This includes non-tariff barriers, restrictive standards, subsidies, and protectionist measures that distort fair competition. The imbalance in economic strength and negotiating power between trading partners further complicates matters. Developing countries, for instance, frequently find themselves at the receiving end of trade negotiations, having to comply with rules that do not favour their interests.

It is precisely because of these challenges that nations increasingly seek alternative strategies to facilitate trade, such as forming regional alliances or entering into bilateral agreements. These arrangements are often seen as more achievable and less demanding than global trade negotiations. Regional trade agreements (RTAs) and bilateral deals offer a more manageable framework for cooperation--- one in which countries can expect a certain degree of mutual understanding and benefit. Geographical proximity often leads to shared challenges and goals, which can be more effectively addressed through joint efforts. For example, neighbouring countries may have similar agricultural concerns, infrastructure limitations, or energy needs, making cooperation more practical and result-driven.

The rise of regionalism in trade, therefore, has been largely driven by the desire for a level playing field-something that multilateralism, despite its broader reach, has frequently failed to provide. Yet, regionalism is not without its flaws. Asymmetries in the economic strength of countries within regional trade blocs have often resulted in unequal benefits. In several such arrangements, smaller or economically weaker members have struggled to keep up, unable to take full advantage of market access opportunities due to their limited production capacity or lack of export-ready goods. These internal disparities can undermine the broader goals of equitable trade and shared prosperity.

Coming back to domestic policies, their role in boosting trade, though undeniably important, must be viewed within these wider limitations. At best, domestic policies can serve to strengthen a country's internal supply base, address inefficiencies, improve product quality, and invest in research and innovation. They can enhance infrastructure, facilitate logistics, streamline customs procedures, and improve the business climate. All of these factors contribute to trade readiness and resilience.

However, domestic policies alone cannot address or overcome the external challenges that come with international trade. These include policy-induced barriers from partner countries, such as anti-dumping duties, phytosanitary standards that act as disguised restrictions, and sudden regulatory changes that disadvantage exporters. No matter how proactive or well-designed a country's internal policies are, they cannot shield it from the shifting landscape of international trade rules that may be tilted in favour of stronger players. For instance, many developing countries have experienced market access difficulties despite liberalising their own markets and aligning domestic policies with international norms. This suggests that mere adoption of trade-friendly policies is not enough to guarantee success in global markets. The external environment, particularly the actions and decisions of trade partners, plays a critical role in shaping outcomes. Without reciprocal openness, supportive international institutions and fair dispute resolution mechanisms, the potential of domestic policies remains unrealised. 

Therefore, while domestic policies form the foundation of a country's trade strategy, they must be complemented by strategic engagement in regional and multilateral forums, capacity-building for trade negotiations and efforts to diversify trade partners and products. Furthermore, building alliances with like-minded countries, investing in regional value chains, and advocating for fairer international trade rules are all critical elements in a broader trade policy framework.

wasiahmed.bd@gmail.com